Your alternative update on #COVID19 for 2021-03-15. Coronavirus Act of 2020 protects the people just like Reichstag Fire Decree of 1933 did

For any of my subscribers who have not installed a Theta Edge Node on their computer, why the heck not? Get it from thetatoken.org.

Reichstag Fire Decree (February 28, 1933) (link).

‘The Decree of the Reich President for the Protection of the People and the State was one of a series of key decrees, legislative acts, and case law in the gradual process by which the Nazi leadership moved Germany from a democracy to a dictatorship’.

‘Popularly known as the Reichstag Fire Decree, the regulations suspended important provisions of the German constitution, especially those safeguarding individual rights and due process of law. The decree permitted the restriction of the right to assembly, freedom of speech’.

The Coronavirus Act of 2020 has the same restrictions and the same justification as the Reichstag Fire Decree of 1933. Have too many people been frightened into a state in which they appear to be not heeding Benjamin Franklin’s warning that those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety?

The Coronavirus Act of 2020, instead of being extended by Parliament when it comes up for a vote later this month, must be consigned to the dustbin of history never to see the light of day ever again.

–

Tory MP Richard Fuller Calls Out Every MP For Allowing This 💩 Show & The Dangers We Now Face (link).

–

Lawyers Tell Human Rights Committee The Government Has Breached Our Human & Common Law Rights (link).

These lawyers reveal the s**t show for what it is – a s**t show.

–

12 Prominent Scientists and Doctors to EU Regulators: Address ‘Urgent’ Safety Concerns or Halt COVID Vaccines (link).

‘In an open letter published this week, a group of 12 prominent scientists and doctors questioned “whether cardinal issues regarding the safety of the vaccines were adequately addressed prior to their approval” by the European Medicines Agency’.

‘A group of prominent scientists and doctors want the European Medicines Agency (EMA) to answer “urgent” safety questions about the three COVID-19 vaccines authorised for use in the EU, or withdraw the vaccines’ authorisation’.

‘In an open letter published this week, the group questioned “whether cardinal issues regarding the safety of the vaccines were adequately addressed prior to their approval” by the EMA.

‘The EMA, which is the EU equivalent of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, approved three vaccines for emergency use in the EU: the Pfizer-BioNtech, Moderna and Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccines’.

’In their letter, 12 scientists and doctors noted a “wide range of side effects” is reported following vaccination of previously healthy younger individuals with the gene-based COVID-19 vaccines’.

‘They wrote:’

‘“Moreover, there have been numerous media reports from around the world of care homes being struck by COVID-19 within days of vaccination of residents. While we recognise that these occurrences might, every one of them, have been unfortunate coincidences, we are concerned that there has been and there continues to be inadequate scrutiny of the possible causes of illness or death under these circumstances, and especially so in the absence of post-mortems examinations.”’

‘In their original letter, sent Feb. 28 via email to the EMA, the group asked the EMA to provide responses to seven safety-related issues within ”seven days and address all our concerns substantively. Should you choose not to comply with this reasonable request, we will make this letter public.”’

‘Several of the safety related concerns included in the letter, such as thrombocytopenia, endothelial injury, microthrombi and stroke, have been reported in The Defender’.

‘The authors, led by Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi, professor emeritus of medical microbiology and immunology, and former chair, Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, have not yet received a response from the EMA’.

’In a written statement Wednesday, the group said:’

‘“Therefore, as a starting point, we believe it is important to enumerate and evaluate all deaths which have occurred within 28 days of vaccination, and to compare the clinical pictures with those who have not been vaccinated’.

‘“More broadly, with respect to the development of COVID-19 vaccines, the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe has stated in their Resolution 2361, on 27th January 2021, that member states must ensure all COVID-19 vaccines are supported by high quality trials that are sound and conducted in an ethical manner. EMA officials, and other regulatory bodies in EU countries, are bound by these criteria. They should be made aware that they may be violating Resolution 2361 by applying medical products still in phase 3 studies’.

‘“Under Resolution 2361, member states must also inform citizens that vaccination is NOT mandatory and ensure that no one is politically, socially, or otherwise pressured to become vaccinated. States are further required to ensure that no one is discriminated against for not receiving the vaccine.”’

‘Bhakdi also issued this video statement, in which he says, “The time for governments to act, the time for everyone to act, is now:”’

‘These are the seven “urgent” safety issues the group wants the EMA to address:’

Following intramuscular injection, it must be expected that the gene-based vaccines will reach the bloodstream and disseminate throughout the body. We request evidence that this possibility was excluded in preclinical animal models with all three vaccines prior to their approval for use in humans by the EMA.
If such evidence is not available, it must be expected that the vaccines will remain entrapped in the circulation and be taken up by endothelial cells. There is reason to assume that this will happen particularly at sites of slow blood flow, i.e. in small vessels and capillaries. We request evidence that this probability was excluded in preclinical animal models with all three vaccines prior to their approval for use in humans by the EMA.
If such evidence is not available, it must be expected that during expression of the vaccines’ nucleic acids, peptides derived from the spike protein will be presented via the MHC I — pathway at the luminal surface of the cells. Many healthy individuals have CD8-lymphocytes that recognize such peptides, which may be due to prior COVID infection, but also to cross-reactions with other types of Coronavirus. We must assume that these lymphocytes will mount an attack on the respective cells. We request evidence that this probability was excluded in preclinical animal models with all three vaccines prior to their approval for use in humans by the EMA.
If such evidence is not available, it must be expected that endothelial damage with subsequent triggering of blood coagulation via platelet activation will ensue at countless sites throughout the body. We request evidence that this probability was excluded in preclinical animal models with all three vaccines prior to their approval for use in humans by the EMA.
If such evidence is not available, it must be expected that this will lead to a drop in platelet counts, appearance of D-dimers in the blood, and to myriad ischaemic lesions throughout the body including in the brain, spinal cord and heart. Bleeding disorders might occur in the wake of this novel type of DIC-syndrome including, amongst other possibilities, profuse bleedings and haemorrhagic stroke. We request evidence that all these possibilities were excluded in pre-clinical animal models with all three vaccines prior to their approval for use in humans by the EMA.
The SARS-CoV-2 spike protein binds to the ACE2 receptor on platelets, which results in their activation. Thrombocytopenia has been reported in severe cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Thrombocytopenia has also been reported in vaccinated individuals [8]. We request evidence that the potential danger of platelet activation that would also lead to disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) was excluded with all three vaccines prior to their approval for use in humans by the EMA.
The sweeping across the globe of SARS-CoV-2 created a pandemic of illness associated with many deaths. However, by the time of consideration for approval of the vaccines, the health systems of most countries were no longer under imminent threat of being overwhelmed because a growing proportion of the world had already been infected and the worst of the pandemic had already abated. Consequently, we demand conclusive evidence that an actual emergency existed at the time of the EMA granting Conditional Marketing Authorisation to the manufacturers of all three vaccines, to justify their approval for use in humans by the EMA, purportedly because of such an emergency.

This open letter has set my hair on fire.

–

We Will NOT Be Silenced: Medical Professionals Worldwide Continue To Speak Out In “Ask The Experts II” (website, video).

Speakers in the film:

Dr. Andrew Kaufman, Medical Doctor & Forensic Psychiatrist from the USA
Dr. Tom Cowan, Medical Doctor from the USA
Dr. Kevin P. Corbett, Qualified Nurse & Health Scientist from the UK
Dr. Anne Fierlafijn, Medical Doctor from Belgium
Dr. Hilde De Smet, Medical Doctor from Belgium
Prof. Konstantin Pavlidis, Metaphysicist from the UK
Dr. Zac Cox, Holistic Dentist & Homeopath from UK
Dr. Piotr Rubas, Medical Doctor from Poland
Dr. Johan Denis, Medical Doctor and Homeopath from Belgium
Senator Scott Jensen, Medical Doctor, Family Physician & Politician from the USA
Dr. Sherri Tenpenny, Medical Doctor from the USA
Dr. Heiko Santelmann, Medical Doctor from Germany
Sandy Lunoe, Pharmacist from Norway
Dr. Simone Gold, Medical Doctor, Physician & Founder of America’s Frontline Doctors USA
Dr. Brian Tyson, Medical Doctor & Family Physician from the USA
Dr. Teryn Clark, Medical Doctor & Neurologist from the USA
Dr. Gaston Cornu-Labat, Medical Doctor, General Surgeon, Holistic & Integrative Physician from Argentina
Dr. Antoine Barbari, Medical Doctor, Senior Consultant, Professor of Medicine from Lebanon
Prof. Dolores Cahill, Molecular Biologist and Immunologist from Ireland
Kate Shemirani, Natural Nurse from the UK
Dr. Mario Cabrera Avivar, Medical Doctor from Uruguay
Dr. Elke F. de Klerk, Medical Doctor from Holland
Dr. Vernon Coleman, General Practitioner from the UK

–

Netherlands becomes latest country to suspend use of AstraZeneca’s Covid-19 vaccine over concerns of possibly serious side effects (link).

–

Why Are We Still Giving People COVID-19 Vaccines? (link).

‘The MHRA and UK government appear to want it both ways here: a death following vaccination, no matter the cause, is not vaccine related, yet a death following a positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR test result, no matter the cause, is definitively a COVID-19 death. In neither case is there a determination to investigate’.

‘The MHRA is also eager to highlight that those who have died following the vaccine were elderly people or people with underlying illness. Clearly they consider this another reason not to consider any vaccine injury possible’.

‘According to the Office of National Statistics (ONS), of the approximate 125,000 deaths attributed COVID-19 in the UK around 113,000 were over the age of 65’.

‘Of these, approximately 19,000 were aged between 65 -74, around 40,000 deaths were among those aged 75 – 84 and the remaining 54,000 were aged over 85’.

‘Up until October 2020, the average age of a COVID-19 death in the UK was 82.4 years. This was slightly older than the average age of mortality from all other causes which was 81.5 years’.

‘In December 2020, the ONS responded to a freedom of information request seeking further information on comorbidity associated with COVID-19 mortality. They stated that up until June 2020 only 8.9% of COVID-19 deaths had no other underlying illness. The remaining 91.1% had at least 1 other underlying illness, with an average of 2.3 comorbidities per decedent recorded during March and April 2020. However, the ONS added:’

‘This publication has now been paused. Therefore, in order to provide an update of this information, we would need to create bespoke analysis … We therefore consider this to be information not held’.

‘It appears every effort has been made to maximise reported COVID-19 mortality while minimising, or even denying, any vaccine related mortality’.

–

‘This was the Met’s George Floyd moment’ – but anyone paying attention would have seen that this was inevitable when the police have been systematically infused for decades with psychopaths and brainless reframed software programs who have no capacity to assess a situation using common sense – and their chief Dick personifies the latter (see my recent now prophetic videocast) (link, link).

‘This was the Met’s George Floyd moment. Pictures of police officers pinning a young woman to the ground during a peaceful protest have been beamed round the world on TV and social media’.

‘No one died, fortunately, but I defy anybody to look at those disgusting images without being overwhelmed by a stomach-churning sense of revulsion’.

‘What the hell were they thinking? Who authorised this heavy-handed brutality? Does the Commissioner of the Met really think this is a legitimate way for her subordinates to behave?’

‘At the risk of coming over all Chris and Glenn from Squeeze, we never thought this could happen to a girl in Clapham’.

‘How on earth did a demonstration by women abhorring violence against women morph into a shocking excuse for gratuitous police violence against women?’

‘Television footage shows Patsy Stevenson being slammed against a tree before she is forced to the ground and handcuffed’.

‘Miss Stevenson was one of an estimated crowd of 1,500 largely female demonstrators who had assembled on Clapham Common for a vigil to commemorate the heart-breaking murder of 33-year-old marketing executive Sarah Everard’.

–

The Psychological Attack on the UK, Part 2 (link).

–

UK Column News – 15th March 2021. Sarah Everard vigil turns violent due to the police desiring to paradoxically keep people safe from the virus. A male speaker warns the vigil crowd about the dictatorship in the guise of public safety which I would say is in the style of the Reichstag Fire Decree of February 28, 1933. Baroness Jones: Discriminating against men with a 6pm curfew would lessen discrimination of all kinds, apparently. You could not make this s**t up. UKGov trademarks: Build Back Better (W6E6F6), Variants of Concern, Level Up (W6E6F6). Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill is counter to a pluralistic free society. The ‘pandemic’ has transformed our hospitals, car parks are empty, once-bustling corridors are quiet. Scotland’s Hate Crime Bill: invading the privacy of the home in the interest of public order is now allowed and should we all have a problem with how a reasonable person can interpret an unreasonable law? Yes, because this will eventually all end in tears. Today’s narrative-mocking image: Permissible Daily Exercise (website, youtube, bitchute, odysee).

–

Police dogs & water cannons: Anti-lockdown protest meets heavy police response in The Hague (VIDEOS) (link).

‘The protesters carried various placards decrying the government’s strict coronavirus measures. A large banner reading “Love & Freedom: No Dictatorship” was displayed by the activists’.

–

Covid19 HUSH MONEY for doctors 💰👨‍💉 – 2.2 Trillion Cares Act distributed billions to hospitals and doctors (reddit).

–

This Open Letter Could Help Us Stop Discriminating Domestic Health Passports (link).

–

Horowitz: The biggest COVID lie right now: No immunity from prior infection (link).

–

Lockdowns have killed millions (link).

‘Two of Hans Rosling’s former colleagues at Karolinska Instituet, professor Anna-Mia Ekström and professor Stefan Swartling Peterson, have gone through the data from UNICEF and UNAIDS, and come to the conclusion that least as many people have died as a result of the restrictions to fight covid as have died of covid directly’.

–

Swedish researchers: Anti-corona restrictions have killed as many people as the virus itself (link).

‘Two of Sweden’s leading experts on global health believe that the restrictions against the coronavirus have killed as many people as the virus itself’.

‘Just over 2.5 million corona-related deaths have been registered worldwide, and at least as many people have lost their lives due to the restrictions, some experts believe’.

‘However, other experts have pointed out that the actual number of corona-related deaths may be far higher than the official figures’.

‘SVT asked professors Stefan Swartling Peterson and Anna Mia Ekström to calculate how many people died due to the anti-corona restrictions’.

‘They believe the number is at least 2.5 million’.

‘Impact of restrictions’

‘The restrictions have first and foremost hit the poorer parts of the world and struck young people, the researchers believe, pointing to children who died of malnutrition and various diseases. They also pointed to adults who died of diseases that could have been treated’.

‘“These deaths we see in poor countries are related to women who die in childbirth, newborns who die early, children who die of pneumonia, diarrhea, and malaria because they are malnourished or not vaccinated,” Peterson said’.

‘Ekström noted that there is excess mortality among young adults who are infected with diseases that can be treated, such as HIV and tuberculosis’.

‘She believes that health developments equivalent to one decade of progress have been lost in one year of anti-corona restrictions’.

–

I expect lockdowns & restrictions to continue until March 2025 when the World Bank’s funding project for convid ends. Control measures will be ready for the new financial system. A centralized global cryptocurrency with no other alternatives in which to transact legally. (tweet).

–

Dr. Bhattacharya: Lockdowns The ‘Biggest Public Health Mistake We’ve Ever Made’ (link).

‘Stanford University Medical School professor Dr. Jay Bhattacharya is featured in Newsweek Magazine condemning the lockdowns across the United States to fight the virus, calling them the biggest mistake ever made by public health authorities. A new study released by none other than the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) ironically appears to bolster Dr. Bhattacharya’s claim. Is the truth starting to seep out from the Berlin Wall of lies?’

–

“The greatest fraud ever perpetrated on an unsuspecting public” (tweet).

–

‘Normality’ WON’T Return Until 2022 🤬 Lockdowns CLEARLY Don’t Work!!! (link).

–

Is it all a lie? – Stay at Home > Protect the NHS > 100K Deaths – An analysis of ONS and NHS data (link).

‘So what we’re seeing here is that is a negligible amount of “Covid” deaths in anyone under the age of 60. But we’re really not seeing very many “Covid” deaths in anybody aged between 60 and 80. What we are seeing is a much higher amount of “Covid” deaths in people aged over 85. But what’s so strange about that?’

‘The average life expectancy in the UK is 81 years. Yet the UK has enforced dictatorial tyranny, destroyed the economy, decimated businesses and people’s livelihoods and created a flood of mental health issues because people who have lived longer than the average life expectancy of 81 are dying. These people have already statistically lived beyond their years. What on earth is the UK government playing at?’

–

Big Pharma is injecting a synthetic pathogen directly into your cells to INDUCE ILLNESS, not to trigger an immuno transmissive response as with a va$cine. This is about programming your own cells to make you sick, irreversibly… #News #COVID19 (tweet).

–

This database includes grant payments made by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (MHRA, link).

–

This new society we’re creating, where nobody is responsible for their own well-being but everyone is responsible for everyone else’s well-being, is a living Hell. (tweet).

–

CDC Vs. Common Sense (link).

‘The death of Common Sense begins with the words initiated by the morass of Bureaucracy couched in safety and security. Indeed, and according to past President Ronald Reagan, the most frightening words to hear in the English language are para ‘We’re here from the government and we’re here to help you!’ The underpinnings of such beginnings appear benign and with benign neglect the malignancy storms through, metastasizing arboreally through the veins of the entire system. The world is seeing such a death these days’.

‘We argue that the real virus is ‘fear’ and ‘fear’ stops people from thinking clearly. Governments and bureaucrats and their expert advisors are depending on people not thinking clearly, and are providing knee-jerk reactions to every facet of the pandemic which only drives fear unnecessarily. We also point out that the fuel for this fear rests on the reliance of our leadership on wholly unreliable PCR testing for SARS-CoV-2. In effect this has led to a fear-based PCRdemic that has not only paralyzed society but has led to massive societal disruption and unnecessary suffering and death’.

‘The CDC has again revealed itself to be a non-autonomous entity grifting on the illogic of pseudoscience with its recent guidance regarding Covid-19 vaccines and travel as well as how vaccinated people can safely visit others. This once glorified agency has stooped to issue conflicting and at times illogical and frankly misleading guidance on Covid which can confuse not only the public, but healthcare providers and policy makers alike. It is troubling that the reports and guidance being produced by the CDC are at times contradictory and very confusing and make no sense. We focus first on the foremost and most disturbing issues of the day: The current guidance follows in step with Dr. Anthony Fauci’s suggestions when he opined that children will be vaccinated in early 2022’.

‘How could Dr. Fauci, who we assume reads the science and understands the science, make this statement when he knows that 1) children were not included in any of the Covid-19 vaccine research studies and as such, the results cannot be extrapolated to them and 2); these actions are even more perplexing particularly if one is ‘following the science,’ which in this case simply does not exist? It needs to be reemphasized that the risk for the development of serious SARS-CoV-2 infection in children is infinitesimally small in the first place (risk is in the range of 0.002%). They are also at very low risk of transmitting virus to other children, to adults, to their teachers, or of taking it home. We know there are exceptions as there are for any infectious pathogen, yet these exceptions remain exceedingly rare. This is not heresy and is a fact, based on undisputed science. This recommendation made by Dr. Fauci does not consider the long-term risks to children, especially given their low probability of infection and even lower probability of illness from the virus. Inserting the potential of harm where little to no risk exists is tantamount to gross malpractice in our opinion’.

How pointless is vaccination for the segment of population who are at 0.002% risk?

–

Independent Research Group @IndependentRe17 (twitter profile).

‘Freedom of speech is on a life support machine, critical thinking appears to be in a coma and real objective journalism in the MSM is now dead!’

–

As the saying goes “The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was to convince the world he doesn’t exist.” I would suggest that on par with that is “The greatest trick this government has ever pulled, was convincing healthy people that they are sick!” (tweet).

–

18. A global ‘one world digital health identity’ is what its about, so next time you hear people talking about Vaccine Passports, make them realise that the passports are a step towards a ‘new global digital & cashless contract’ with the globalists. Always follow the money! (tweet).

–

19 DUAL USE TYRANNY Africa to Become Testing Ground for “Trust Stamp” digital Vaccine Records and Payment Systems. A new biometric identity platform partnered with the Gates-funded GAVI vaccine alliance and Mastercard will launch in West Africa. (tweet).

–

BREAKING NEWS-The International Criminal Court at the Hague has accepted the complaint for the violation of the Nuremberg code by the Israeli Government. NOTE- copies of it have been sent to media worldwide- will they publish? https://databaseitalia.it/il-tribunale-penale-internazionale-ha-accolto-la-denuncia-per-violazione-del-codice-di-norimberga-del-governo-israeliano/ (tweet).

–

“The greatest fraud ever perpetrated on an unsuspecting public” (tweet).

–

University of Florida researchers find no asymptomatic or presymptomatic spread (December 22, 2020, link).

‘Four researchers from the University of Florida Department of Biostatistics co-authored a study published online by the Journal of the American Medical Association. They performed a meta-analysis of 54 studies looking at the household secondary attack rate of SARS-CoV-2. According to the CDC, the secondary attack rate is the number of new cases among contacts divided by the total number of contacts’.

‘The researchers confirmed that SARS-CoV-2 is more contagious than other coronaviruses, with a secondary attack rate of 16.6% (95% CI 14.0%-19.3%) compared to 7.5% (95%CI 4.8%-10.7%) for SARS-CoV and 4.7% (95%CI, 0.9%-10.7%) for MERS-CoV’.

‘Their findings also confirmed the attack rate is higher to adult contacts compared to child contacts and to spouses compared to other family members’.

‘The secondary attack rate for symptomatic index cases was 18.0% (95% CI 14.2%-22.1%), and the rate of asymptomatic and presymptomatic index cases was 0.7% (95% CI 0%-4.9%), “although there were few studies in the latter group.” The asymptomatic/presymptomatic secondary attack rate is not statistically different from zero, and the confidence interval is technically 0.7 ± 4.2, resulting in a range of -3.5%-4.9%, but attack rates cannot be negative, so it is truncated at 0’.

–

(British Medical Journal) Asymptomatic transmission of covid-19 (21 December 2020, link).

‘It’s also unclear to what extent people with no symptoms transmit SARS-CoV-2. The only test for live virus is viral culture. PCR and lateral flow tests do not distinguish live virus. No test of infection or infectiousness is currently available for routine use.6 7 8 As things stand, a person who tests positive with any kind of test may or may not have an active infection with live virus, and may or may not be infectious.9’

‘The relations between viral load, viral shedding, infection, infectiousness, and duration of infectiousness are not well understood. In a recent systematic review, no study was able to culture live virus from symptomatic participants after the ninth day of illness, despite persistently high viral loads in quantitative PCR diagnostic tests. However, cycle threshold (C_t) values from PCR tests are not direct measures of viral load and are subject to error.10’

The first of the above paragraphs has 6, yes SIX, caveats and the second has 4 caveats – FFS.

–

Worldwide Medical Tyranny in Finland Under Covid-19 Regulations (link).

–

Bianca Williams stop-and-search: Met PCs ‘must justify use of handcuffs’ (link).

‘Team GB sprinter Bianca Williams has welcomed the outcome of a review into the Met Police’s use of handcuffs after she was subjected to a stop and search’.

‘Ms Williams accused the force of “racially profiling” her and her partner when they were handcuffed and separated from their baby son in July’.

‘Commissioner Dame Cressida Dick apologised to the athlete after footage of their car being stopped went online’.

‘The Met referred itself to the police watchdog’.

‘Scotland Yard said the force would improve its “training, policy and processes” following the review, which makes 10 recommendations’.

Stop, handcuffed and searched so what exactly happened to her right to liberty and her right to be secure from an unreasonable search? I would be asking this if the subject was a white guy.

–

Five Met Police officers are under investigation by force watchdog over ‘racially profiled’ stop-and-search of Team GB athlete Bianca Williams (link).

–

The Founders Warned Us About Abuses Like H.R. 1 (link).

‘H.R. 1, the bill that would seize control of federal elections from the states, comes with an unusual twist. It supposedly promotes “access.” But it says anyone challenging its constitutionality is barred from every court in the nation but a single federal trial court in Washington, D.C.!’

‘Bottom line: The drafters of H.R. 1 were wrong to proclaim unlimited power to regulate federal elections and campaigns. On the contrary, the Elections Clause grants Congress only limited authority. A runaway Congress should never be permitted to seize more power than the Constitution gives it’.

–

paulthepaperbear