Your alternative updates on COVID-19 each weekday since April 2020
THEY’RE BACK: WATCH — Censored American Doctors Return to Steps of SCOTUS to Drop MORE Bombs on RIGGED Coronavirus Vaccines (link).
17m25s ‘At this point it is not a medical crisis, it is an emotional crisis’.
US virus numbers now include probable cases without tests (April 15, 2020, link).
One of the many ways to inflate the numbers so that this $8 billion scam could move forward.
UK Column News – 31st July 2020. PM: ‘I think I repeated that (propaganda) often enough’. Cases do not translate into hospitalizations or deaths (link, link).
THEY MOVED THE GOALPOSTS…AGAIN!: “IT’S NOT OVER WHEN THE VACCINE ARRIVES” (link).
It will be over when enough of the people say it is over.
No jab, no job? NEJM says everyone needs to be vaccinated for coronavirus in order to go to work (link).
‘A new paper published in the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) attempts to make the case that people who refuse a future vaccine for the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) should no longer be allowed to work and make a living’.
‘In order to enforce compliance with potential vaccine mandates, the paper, entitled, “Ensuring Uptake of Vaccines against SARS-CoV-2,” states that “substantive penalties” need to be imposed, including loss of employment’.
‘As opposed to fines or criminal penalties, suspension of employment is supposedly a “less coercive” way of achieving compliance, the paper contends, adding that “state mandates should not be structured as compulsory vaccination (absolute requirements): instead, noncompliance should incur a penalty.”’
‘“Nevertheless, because of the infectiousness and dangerousness of the virus, relatively substantive penalties could be justified, including employment suspension or stay-at-home orders for persons in designated high-priority groups who refuse vaccination,” the paper goes on to state’.
‘“Neither fines nor criminal penalties should be used, however; fines disadvantage the poor, and criminal penalties invite legal challenges on procedural due-process grounds. Both are bad public health policy for a Covid-19 vaccine because they may stoke distrust without improving uptake.”’
‘This would seem to align with President Donald Trump’s “Operation Warp Speed” initiative to unveil a fast-tracked vaccine for the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) by the end of 2020. Trump has stated that this vaccine will not be mandatory, but perhaps he has a similar plan in mind as the one outlined in this paper to withdraw access to work as a “penalty” for refusing to “voluntarily” get jabbed’.
‘The paper takes additional aim at vaccine refusers, which are said to include more than half of all Americans. Its authors lament the fact that most Americans want nothing to do with a Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) jab, and are instead choosing to rely on their God-given immune systems to keep them healthy’.
From Sweden To Uruguay The Evidence Is Clear: Lockdown ‘Cure’ Worse Than The Disease (link).
BREAKING: YouTube de-platforms Del Bigtree’s “The Highwire” channel after his investigations questioned the rigged COVID-19 narrative of the WHO and CDC (link).
This censorship makes me want to sharel how the WHO and CDC have rigged the COVID-19 narrative.
Breitbart Still Suspended From Twitter After Viral HCQ Video; Doctor Gets Axe Over Involvement (link).
‘Just days after the establishment – via its Big Tech partners and liberal media propagandists – entirely disappeared a viral video of a dozen doctors discussing their real-life experiences of treating COVID-19 (and in some cases using the “extremely dangerous” medicine – if mainstream media is to be believed – hydroxchloroquine) and getting children back to school; the founder of “America’s Frontline Doctors” – Dr. Simone Gold – has been fired from her job as an Emergency Medicine Specialist in Los Angeles, CA’.
‘As we previously noted, in the video, Dr. Gold said:’
‘“We’re here because we feel as though the American people have not heard from all the expertise that’s out there all across our country.”’
‘She is also the head organizer of an open letter signed by more than 600 doctors calling on President Trump to end lockdown. The letter described widespread state orders keeping businesses closed and children home from school as a “mass casualty incident” with “exponentially growing health consequences.”’
The Biggest Fraud Ever, Part 2: The Vaccine Swindle (link).
‘Read Part 1 here…’
‘It was originally assumed that only those who had previously been infected by the virus and developed an antibody response had any immunity, hence the initial focus on testing for the presence of these antibodies as well as infection. However, studies of antibodies in formerly infected patients demonstrated accuracy issues which subsequently could be explained instead by the antibodies’ rapid decay in recovering patients. The often disappointingly low levels of antibodies in population samples is often used as evidence that herd immunity is not a realistic goal without a vaccine’.
‘This is not correct’.
‘At the end of May there was a significant breakthrough in understanding of COVID antibodies which was not widely reported: a Swiss study from Zurich led by Professor Onur Boyman demonstrated that a large proportion of the population had a natural immunity through existing antibodies on the mucous membrane (IgA) or cellular immunity (T cells), likely to have been acquired through previous exposure to coronaviruses such as influenza or the common cold (the absence of exposure to previous coronavirus is now thought to explain the opposite effect in 1918)’.
‘The study found that that the presence of (IgG and IgM) antibodies generated on infection which tests had previously focused on, were NOT in fact required to defeat the virus and that existing (IgA and T cell) antibodies that gave a natural immunity. Moreover, the population with this natural immunity was demonstrated to be five times greater than those with the IgG and IgM antibodies on which tests had hitherto focused. If this could be substantiated, then the population already exposed to COVID would also be five times greater than previously assumed. In other words, if a population sample showed 10% had IgG and IgM antibodies (which might be subject to decay) then it was likely that at least half of the population had already been exposed to COVID’.
‘It followed that antibody studies that measured only IgG and IgM that were now predicting population-based mortality risk of 0.1% to 0.5% (lower than the 1% in the elderly population aboard the Diamond Princess) could be even further reduced by a factor of five to 0.02% to 0.1% and the level of symptomatic exposure from 20% to below 5% (consistent with the flu season ironically predicted by Fauci in March). Not only would this mean a further similar reduction in the estimated true mortality rate but it meant that there were far fewer people in the population who had never had exposure to the virus, so a far lower number who could potentially catch the virus in the future.
In short, the infamous herd immunity was much closer than previously realised’.
‘Fig 7. Sweden’s curve flattens without lockdown’
‘This explained why, by July, the virus had all but disappeared in populations like Sweden, New York (Fig. 7) and Wuhan (which reportedly tested its entire population of 11 million and found only 300 cases, all of which were asymptomatic) which were significantly affected by a “first wave”: if the ratio of those with IgA and T cell antibodies to IgG and IgM antibodies across population was confirmed at a factor of five then if 20% of the population had traditional IgG and IgM antibodies (such as New York with 21% and London with 17%) then the virus died out because there was simply no one left for it to infect. It followed that the virus could only survive in population samples where testing showed the presence of IgG and IgM antibodies was below 20% (and allowing for their decay probably well below)’.
‘Nobel Prize winning biological scientist Michael Levitt had already come to the same conclusion based on a different approach: he predicted that the virus would “burn out” when it had infected 15-20% of the population though based on a pattern predicted by the “Gompertz curve” which indicated that the number of deaths after the peak is roughly double those from before resulting in Levitt accurately predicting the number of Chinese and Swedish deaths, months in advance. Levitt has recently bravely predicted that US COVID will “be done in 4 weeks [25 Aug] with a total reported death below 170,000”, compared to 149,000 today’.
‘Boyman’s theory on “IgA and T Cell immunity” explained the accuracy of Levitt’s “Gompertz curve” predictions and this was now being backed up by the empirical evidence which showed that the populations which were hit hardest with high initial rates of infection and mortality, were the ones where the virus had almost disappeared’.
‘Almost none of this was reported by a media which choose instead to attach the misnomer “second wave” to outbreaks of COVID infection in populations which had not yet experienced any meaningful “first wave”: the Sunbelt states in the US, Australia, Hong Kong, Japan. The irony was that the vulnerability of populations which had not yet seen meaningful infection outbreaks and therefore the fallacy of lockdown had already been predicted by Levitt and Giesecke. It was also logical that population groups where IgG and IgM antibodies were still significantly below 20% would continue to see infections’.
“There Is No Proven Effectiveness” – Netherlands Refuses To Mandate Mask Wearing In Public (link).
UK Academics Advocate Silencing Dissent On Climate Change & COVID-19 (link).
‘Things have sure changed since I went to school. I remember my professors arguing for logic, debate and reason, rather than an authoritarian shutdown of dissent.‘
When Will Covid Tyranny End? W.H.O. Director: ‘Never!’ Unless… (link).
Metropolitan Police brutalise family during the peak of COVID-19 pandemic. 22 April 2020 (link).