Your alternative update on #COVID19 for 2021-02-10. ‘Follow the science’ vs ‘opinions on demand’ & censorship. Shaky science behind new strains

‘German ministry hired scientists to induce corona fear’ (link).

‘At the beginning of last year, the German Ministry of the Interior worked with several scientists on a strategy to increase fear of corona, in order to foster understanding for drastic corona measures. The newspaper Die Welt reports this on the basis of a leaked email exchange’.

‘Minister of the Interior Seehofer and the scientists involved have so far not responded. Opposition parties demand clarification’.

‘The emails date from March and April 2020, when Germany was in the first lockdown. Seehofer was concerned about easing too quickly and instructed his State Secretary Markus Kerber to come up with a plan to create support for more stringent measures’.

‘Kerber sent an email to several scientists, universities and research institutes asking, among other things, for a worst-case scenario to get a “mental and systematic” grip on the situation. This would help to plan “measures of a preventive and repressive nature”’.

‘The scientists provided plenty of suggestions, including proposals to put “fear and obedience in the population” on the agenda, writes Die Welt. For this purpose, campaigns could be used with images of people dying of breathlessness because there are no IC beds available’.

Warnings for millions of deaths’

The serious thing is that scientists “negotiated” among themselves about the possible death toll that should be mentioned. The RKI, the German RIVM, proposed to work with their estimate of 0.56 percent of the infected persons, but an employee of the RWI, an influential economic research institute, argued for the death rate of 1.2 percent’.

‘He wrote that they had to think “from the purpose of the model”, which is to emphasize “a lot of pressure to act” and therefore present the numbers “better worse than too good”’.

‘Both mortality rates are included in the Ministry’s final strategy document. For the worst-case scenario, they used the percentage suggested by the RWI. If the government does not act, 70 percent of the population could become infected and the death toll could run into the millions, Seehofer warned several times at the time’.

‘The emails were meant to be kept secret. They were released after months of proceedings from a Berlin group of lawyers, who sent them to Die Welt. The names of scientists have been made illegible in the emails. It is clear that Lothar Wieler, the boss of the RKI, was involved in the email exchange. The RKI does not want to say anything about it, because it would be an “internal discussion document”’.

‘Opinions on order’’

State Secretary Kerber has already responded to the article in Die Welt. The emails should not be viewed as “an all-encompassing theoretical treatise,” he says in Die Welt. He says they were “faced with the task of preventing a worst-case scenario.”’

‘The opposition demands clarification from Seehofer. It cannot be that politics gets “opinions on demand” from science, says Die Linke party chairman Dietmar Bartsch in Die Welt. According to him, politics and science are doing each other a disservice, because trust in science is being damaged’.

‘The liberal party FDP wants an explanation of the ministry in the interior committee of the Bundestag tomorrow. FDP member Konstantin Kühne writes on Twitter that it is normal for science and politics to exchange ideas, but it cannot be the case that “tailor-made” results are presented, he says’.

UK Column News – 10th February 2021. England & Wales All-Cause Mortality correction to the figure for 2020 – 607,002 replacing the estimated 561,529. Covid-related deaths continue to increase in care homes following vaccination. Get ‘opinions on demand’ from scientists so that they can then falsely terrify the nation’s people, to prepare the ground for all the measures to follow. Anthony Stansfeld Thames Valley Police and Crime Commissioner and his team are uncovering masses of banking wrongdoing that has been assisted and covered up by the banks, by the judiciary, and by regulators all the way up to the top, defrauded £100 billion from British businesses, but also collectively £1.2 trillion that has put over 60,000 businesses to the wall. Among them are 109 individuals who have been seriously defrauded (website, youtube, bitchute).

Stanford Medical Prof: Scientists Are Being Censored For Sharing “Alternative” Info About COVID (link).

The shaky science behind the “deadly new strains” of Sars-Cov-2 (link).

‘According to what we hear from officials and the mainstream media, the new variants are the most dangerous and unpredictable beings since Osama bin Laden’.

‘Everyone needs to stay safe from these invisible but murderously mighty microbes by shunning contact with the unwashed, unmasked and unvaccinated’.

‘But is that drastic approach — which is accompanied by severe curtailment of civil liberties and constitutional rights — warranted?’

‘It turns out that the case for the variants’ contagiousness and dangerousness centres largely on the theoretical effects of just one change said to stem from a mutation in the virus’s genes. And, as I’ll show in this article, that case is very shaky’.

‘That one change is known as N501Y — scientific shorthand for the substitution of one protein building block (amino acid) for another at position 501 in the part of the virus called the spike protein’.

‘Specifically, position 501 lies in the portion of the spike protein that’s responsible for the intimate coupling between the virus and cells that lets the virus slip inside and multiply’.

‘[Note that any such amino-acid switcheroo is correctly called a change, not a mutation. Mutations occur only in genes. For some reason many scientists and scribes who ought to know better are mistakenly calling N501Y and other amino-acid changes ‘mutations.’ ]’

‘A very preliminary study published Dec. 22, 2020, suggested that N501Y also is present in the South African variant named 501Y.V2. And another very preliminary study, published January 12, 2021, asserted it was also present in the new strain emerging from the Brazilian jungle, dubbed P.1’.

‘On top of that, the South African variant is being reported as evading immunity and B.1.1.7 sharing this escape route. And scientists are depicting new variants with N501Y on board as spreading very fast. Some say they make herd immunity impossible, so every single person on earth has to be vaccinated. The models also suggest B.1.1.7 is up to 91% deadlier than the regular novel coronavirus’.

‘(Yet so far it seems the main basis for officials saying it’s more deadly is shown in the minutes of the Jan. 21, 2021 meeting of an influential UK committee called New and Emerging Respiratory Virus Threats Advisory Group [NERVTAG ]. There, they cite modeling papers which haven’t yet been published – which means that until they’re published there’s no way to check their work.)’

‘THREE NON-PEER-REVIEWED THEORETICAL-MODELING PAPERS WHICH CATAPULTED VARIANTS INTO THE SPOTLIGHT’

‘Public-health officials, politicians and the mainstream media around the world turned their collective headlights on the variants right after the publication of three theoretical-modeling papers on B.1.1.7, a variant originating in the U.K. The first was a Technical Briefing by Public Health England published Dec. 21 (it’s the first of an ongoing series of reports on the variant authored by people working at the agency and at other institutions), the second a paper published Dec. 23 by a mathematical-modeling group at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, and the third a theoretical-modeling manuscript posted Dec. 31 by a large group of UK scientists’.

None of the three papers was checked over for accuracy by objective observers – a process called ‘peer review.’ Nonetheless, all three were portrayed as solid science by many scientists, politicians, public-health officials and the press’.

(I reached out for comment to Public Health England, as well as to the first author of the second paper Nicholas Davies, and to the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. The only reply I received was from a media-relations person at Public Health England; she told me no one was available for an interview.)’

CDC Exposed: Inflated Covid Deaths By 1600% Throughout The Election, “Violated Multiple Federal Laws” Peer-Reviewed Study Finds…State, Local Governments Must Act (link).

Police raided the PPC gym in Liverpool last night as someone grassed that they were open during lockdown, 2 arrested and 52 fined, and this is what they did to the owner. You awake to the Coronavirus tyranny yet? Share this video please (tweet).

This is one of the ppl that were in the gym. Was hit so hard with a baton  that it broke his leg in 3 places. (tweet).

This is madness.

EXCLUSIVE: Man violently arrested for LEGALLY not wearing a mask (link).

Long-term mask wearing may contribute to advanced stage lung cancer, study finds – They are killing you, dismantling your health and your children’s health and the fascist psychopaths KNOW IT. How insane for police face-nappies to enforce dangerous mask-wearing while destroying their own health by doing it themselves. Clearly passing the intelligence test is a bad career move (link, link).

LETTER FROM INDIA: Crackdown on Rights & Freedoms (link).

Betwa Sharma reports on the evolving authoritarianism of the Modi government in response to the protesting farmers camped out on national highways during a very cold winter’.

‘The locations are Delhi’s borders with Haryana and Uttar Pradesh in northern India, but images posted on Twitter last week of drones, cement walls, rows of barricades, rolls of concertina wire, trenches and iron spikes sparked comments about whether they were India’s borders with China and Pakistan’.

‘The images captured the evolving authoritarianism of Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s government in response to the hundreds of thousands of farmers who have spent an extremely cold winter camped out on national highways leading to Delhi’.

Tweets by pop star Rihanna, climate change activist Greta Thunberg and other international celebrities have forced unprecedented global attention onto the months-long farmers’ protest against three controversial farms laws and the undemocratic way they were passed’.

‘The Modi government’s reaction to the international attention has turned the spotlight onto the steady diet of false propaganda and punitive action that has been used to crush dissent ever since the Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) came to power in 2014’.

‘For the past six years, protests have been projected as conspiracies to derail the country, journalists have been accused of crimes like sedition and jailed and anyone challenging the government narrative has been called “anti-national.”’

Bill Gates and His ‘War on Cash’ Suffer Partial Defeat at the European Court, Economist Explains (link).

‘Major financial institutions such as Visa and Mastercard along with the International Monetary Fund, billionaire Bill Gates and the US Treasury, have been lobbying for cash to be abolished worldwide and replaced with digital only currencies’.

‘Norbert Häring holds a PhD in economics and is co-founder and co-director of the World Economics Association, the second largest association of economists worldwide. Dr Häring is a financial journalist and author of popular books on economics. He also maintains a blog discussing economic and financial matters called “Money and more”’.

‘Häring’s two most recent books cover the campaign to abolish cash. The latest “Schönes neues Geld” (Brave new money) was published in German in 2018 and recently translated into Chinese’.

‘In 2015, Häring initiated a lawsuit within the German court system for the right to pay his fees to public broadcasters in cash. Certain legal aspects of the case made their way to the European Court of Justice (CJEU). On 26 January 2021, the Grand Chamber of the CJEU made its ruling and Häring spoke with Sputnik to discuss its implications’.

Sputnik: What exactly did the European Court of Justice decide in its recent ruling regarding the ability of public authorities to curtail the use of cash?’

‘Dr Norbert Häring: I had sued a public broadcaster for their refusal to let me pay the obligatory fee with the legal tender euro banknotes and coins. The highest German administrative court had asked the CJEU to clarify if national rules regulating the meaning of legal tender are still valid and – if not – what European law would say on the issue at hand’.

‘The CJEU has ruled that national governments remain free to issue laws that would force all public entities, or even private ones, to accept euro cash, but also to pass laws which restrict this obligation to accept cash. The condition is that this cannot be done with the purpose of regulating what legal tender entails. It is a very complex ruling, with very questionable arguments, which I take to be a very political one’.

‘It is best understood from the desired outcome, which is ex-post legalisation of existing restrictions on the acceptance of cash. The ruling is very close to the intervention of the EU Commission during the hearing, which was by far the most hostile to cash of all the interventions that were given.’ 

Sputnik: Where can we find the submissions made by the EU Commission in your case?’

‘Dr Norbert Häring: The EU-Commission, the ECB and the governments of Germany, Italy and France submitted opinions during the proceedings. These were marked as confidential, so I cannot publish them’.

Sputnik: What impact will the European Court’s decision have on the German courts in respect of your case?’

‘Dr Norbert Häring: It is not clear, yet, what the impact on the final ruling of the German court will be. If the Bundesverwaltungsgericht were to follow the arguments of the CJEU very closely I would lose my case, since the CJEU sees a right to pay cash only for those who do not have a bank account. However, I am confident that the German court will judge the question of whether the restrictions to accepting cash are necessary and proportional in a way that is more favourable to my case. We will have to see’.

Sputnik: How does this decision impact the “War on Cash” being pushed by the likes of Bill Gates, the IMF and various credit and banking institutions?’

‘Dr Norbert Häring: On the supranational, European level the ruling has opened the gates for more restrictions. The EU Commission has reacted quickly and announced that they intend to push for a uniform upper limit for cash payments in the EU’.

Sputnik: Would you consider this decision a victory for those who oppose the push towards a cashless society?’

Dr Norbert Häring: Hardly. At best, if the Bundesverwaltungsgericht issues a cash-friendly ruling, the push to abolish cash is held up a bit in Germany. However, the good thing is that, this court case has contributed to bringing the war on cash into the open. In the longer term cash cannot be preserved if there is no public awareness of the issue and no public resistance’.

Capitol protest organizer outed as “prolific” FBI informant (link).

New evidence has emerged that shows the so-called “insurrection” that took place at the United States Capitol on Jan. 6 was a contrived false flag event spearheaded at least in part by an undercover FBI informant’.

‘Proud Boys leader Enrique Tarrio, who helped usher protesters into the Capitol to take photos and stuff, is a top “opposition” leader and “prolific” informant for both the Federal Bureau of Investigation and other law enforcement agencies, a court transcript obtained by Reuters reveals’.

Leave a comment