Your alternative update on #COVID19 for 2021-02-03. Fatalities 16.7 Times Too High Due to ‘Illegal’ Inflation. 271 deaths, 9,845 AE post-injection

For any of my subscribers who have not installed a Theta Edge Node on their computer, why the heck not? Get it from thetatoken.org.

In March 2020, the CDC changed the way COVID-19 deaths are reported on death certificates, resulting in a dramatic — and possibly illegal — inflation of fatalities that drove restrictive public health policies threatening health freedom

Only 6% of COVID-19 deaths include only COVID-19 as the cause on the death certificate, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. This means for the other 94%, additional causes are listed, with an average of 2.9 additional conditions or causes of death included.[i]

“This is the most important statistical revelation of this crisis,” according to a study by the Institute for Pure and Applied Knowledge (IPAK), as it reveals that many “COVID-19 deaths” may have been due to other causes. In fact, the CDC published new guidelines on March 24, 2020, which alter the way deaths are recorded exclusively in cases of COVID-19’.

‘The guidelines were published without peer-review or opportunity for public comment, and resulted in a dramatic and misleading inflation in “COVID-19” deaths, which would have been deemed due to other causes using the CDC’s longstanding system of data collection and reporting established in 2003. As IPAK’s report questioned:[ii]

“Why would the CDC decide against using a system of data collection & reporting they authored, and which has been in use nationwide for 17 years without incident, in favor of an untested & unproven system exclusively for COVID-19 without discussion and peer-review?”

CDC Changed Death Certificate Recording Rules for COVID-19 Only’

IPAK’s report reveals a historical timeline of events showing how a number of incidents conspired to inflate COVID-19 fatality data and, in turn, justify restrictive public health policies like lockdowns, quarantines, business closures and social distancing. One key issue has to do with the way cause of death is recorded in the case of comorbidities’.

In March 2020, the CDC changed the way COVID-19 deaths are reported on death certificates, resulting in a dramatic — and possibly illegal — inflation of fatalities that drove restrictive public health policies threatening health freedom

Only 6% of COVID-19 deaths include only COVID-19 as the cause on the death certificate, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. This means for the other 94%, additional causes are listed, with an average of 2.9 additional conditions or causes of death included.[i]

“This is the most important statistical revelation of this crisis,” according to a study by the Institute for Pure and Applied Knowledge (IPAK), as it reveals that many “COVID-19 deaths” may have been due to other causes. In fact, the CDC published new guidelines on March 24, 2020, which alter the way deaths are recorded exclusively in cases of COVID-19’.

‘The guidelines were published without peer-review or opportunity for public comment, and resulted in a dramatic and misleading inflation in “COVID-19” deaths, which would have been deemed due to other causes using the CDC’s longstanding system of data collection and reporting established in 2003. As IPAK’s report questioned:[ii]

“Why would the CDC decide against using a system of data collection & reporting they authored, and which has been in use nationwide for 17 years without incident, in favor of an untested & unproven system exclusively for COVID-19 without discussion and peer-review?”

CDC Changed Death Certificate Recording Rules for COVID-19 Only’

IPAK’s report reveals a historical timeline of events showing how a number of incidents conspired to inflate COVID-19 fatality data and, in turn, justify restrictive public health policies like lockdowns, quarantines, business closures and social distancing. One key issue has to do with the way cause of death is recorded in the case of comorbidities’.

‘In 2003, the CDC published the “Medical Examiners’ and Coroners’ Handbook on Death Registration and Fetal Death Reporting” and “Physicians’ Handbook on Medical Certification of Death.” Part I of a death certificate includes the immediate cause of death, listed in order from the official cause of death (a) down to underlying causes that contributed to death (in descending order of importance, as b, c, d)’.

‘Part II of the death certificate includes other significant conditions that are not related to the underlying causes in Part I. According to the report:[iii]

“Comorbid conditions have been listed on Part I of death certificates as causes of death per the CDC Handbook since 2003 to ensure accurate reporting can be developed. Comorbidities are seldom placed in Part II. Part II is typically the section where coroners and medical examiners can list recent infections as underlying, initiating factors’.

Prior to the CDC’s March 24th decision, any co-morbidities would have been listed in Part I rather than Part II and initiating factors such as infections including the SARS-COV-2 virus, would have been listed on the last line in Part I or more commonly in Part II.”

After the March 2020 guideline change, however, comorbidities were to be listed in Part II, which meant COVID-19 could be listed exclusively in Part I:[iv]

“This has had a significant impact on data collection accuracy and integrity. It has resulted in the potential false inflation of COVID-19 fatality data and is a potential breach of federal laws governing information quality.”

New CDC Guidelines Inflate COVID-19 Deaths by at Least 16.7-Fold’

The report examined COVID-19 fatalities through August 23, 2020 and compared them using the CDC’s guidelines that had been in place since 2003 and those put into place in March 2020 for COVID-19. You can see the results in their figure below, which shows, “Had the CDC used the 2003 guidelines, the total COVID-19 [fatalities would] be approximately 16.7 times lower than is currently being reported.”[v]

At least 271 deaths, 9,845 adverse events after COVID vaccination so far: CDC data (link).

‘The data indicates that the deaths, reported by the vaccine injury tracking system for the U.S. Centers for Disease Control, mostly occurred within 48 hours of the vaccine being administered’

Why Is There A Correlation Between The Vaccine Rollout And Increased COVID–19 Mortality? (link).

‘Therefore, the percentage chance of a test discovering an alleged “case” of COVID–19 was 12.7%. The claimed chance of one of these “cases” leading to hospitalisation was 46.9%, and the confirmed “case” risk of dying (Case Fatality Rate — CFR) was a staggering, and frankly unbelievable, 15.6%’.

‘Next, we can consider the period from 11 May 2020 to 30 September 2020. During the summer months, you would expect the raw numbers for any respiratory illness to be much lower. This period takes us up the point where the new “variants of concern” were well established’.

‘There were 20,738,550 tests given, resulting in 235,334 cases and 43,926 hospitalisations. A total of 9,046 people died during this period. The percentage chance of a test finding a case was 1.1%, with an 18.7% chance of subsequent hospitalisation. The CFR had dropped to 3.8%’.

‘Now, let’s look at the period of new variant activity up to the start of the vaccine rollout. As we were heading towards winter here, we might expect a general increase in disease contagion and severity’.

‘Between 1 October and 9 December 2020, there were 21,218,805 tests carried out, finding 1,315,529 cases. Of these, 92,999 people were hospitalised and 21,674 died. The case discovery rate was 6.2%, the hospitalisation rate was 7.1% and the CFR was 1.6%’.

‘The chances of a positive test had increased, suggesting a more contagious COVID–19 variant than seen during the summer. However, the new variants of SARS–CoV–2 were nearly 7 times less transmissible than observed during the initial spring outbreak. The chance of hospitalisation was lower, and they were also less than half as deadly as the summer variants and nearly ten times less lethal than the spring variants’.

‘The data shows that the new variants discovered in the autumn of 2020 were both less contagious and less lethal than the variants encountered in the initial spring outbreak. They were notably more contagious than the variants that persisted during the summer, but were far less dangerous’.

‘Finally, let’s look at the recent period since the rollout of the vaccine. From 10 December 2020 to 31 January 2021, there were 25,982,406 tests, which discovered 1,995,048 cases. This led to 154,019 hospitalisations and 42,038 so called COVID–19 deaths’.

‘The case rate rose from 6.2% to 7.6%, continuing the trend of increasing transmission with the new prevalent variants, though it remained much lower than during the spring. Yet strangely, hospitalisation rose to 7.7% and the CFR jumped from 1.6% to 2.1%’.

‘These figures are very difficult to reconcile from a new variant perspective. During October, November and early December, the new variants had accounted for an increased rate of transmission — but significantly lower rates of hospitalisation and mortality. The disease risk trend continued to decline, even in comparison to former summer variants’.

‘During the vaccine rollout, despite continued falling mortality rates in early December, the new COVID–19 variants suddenly changed behaviour. Hospitalisation rates increased by more than 8% and the mortality risk shot up by over 31%’.

‘Harsher winter conditions are expected to account for more numbers of hospitalisations and deaths, but not to fundamentally change the characteristics of the resultant disease. Some other factor must have been at work during the vaccine rollout’.

People with underlying conditions died of covid, but people who die from the covid vaccine died from their underlying conditions. Funny how that works (link).

UK Column News – 3rd February 2021. Matt Hancock reveals that Matt Damon film Contagion inspired UK vaccine strategy. Is Matt Hancock living in the real world? Media Bias/Fact Check: the UK Column does produce credible, well-sourced news (website, youtube, bitchute).

Can your employer force you to have the fake vaccination? NO – remember this … (link).

Robert F. Kennedy Jr’s CHILDREN’S HEALTH DEFENSE Foils California Schools’ Plan To Prematurely Mandate COVID-19 Tests And Vaccines For Students And Teachers (link).

‘Alix Mayer, President, Children’s Health Defense, and California Chapter Board Director, Children’s Health Defense (CHD), has issued a sharply-worded letter to 1,100 California school superintendents, that use of unproven or unreliable PCR tests and experimental COVID-19 vaccines cannot be mandated and any of these unproven medical technologies can only be offered to symptomatic patients via their own doctor’.

‘The letter urges abandonment of premature efforts by the California Department of Education and the Los Angeles Unified School District to mandate these tests and force vaccination on students and employees as a requirement to return to campus once lockdown measures are lifted’.

‘The 19-page letter calls attention to laws that forbid any mandated vaccines or tests that are approved for emergency use would violate federal and state laws.  Furthermore, use of these medical interventions requires informed consent’.

‘Threatened litigation’

‘The CHD letter warns “any establishment of such a requirement will expose public schools to legal liability.”  The letter goes on to say: “We may have no recourse but to take legal action,” noting that CHD has already initiated litigation against coerced PCR testing as a condition for in-person learning in New York City’.

‘Alix Mayer’s letter also refers to protections under the Nuremberg Code that require “exercise of free choice without undue inducement or any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress or other forms of constraint or coercion.”’

‘The letter goes on to state: “the Centers for Disease Control concedes it is illegal and unethical to mandate PCR testing in schools.”  Under the Emergency Use Authorization, “vaccines are not allowed to be mandatory.”’

‘Flawed test’

‘Furthermore, according to the FDA “the widely used PCR test should never be used on healthy people, should only be used in a clinical setting, and only in the presence of symptoms.”’

‘CHD reveals “positive PCR results do not rule out bacterial or co-infection with other viruses.”  Any positive PCR test is to be considered unconfirmed if the patient is not also tested for flu, pertussis (whooping cough), tuberculosis, or other pathogens.  In other words, virtually all of the PCR tests performed in the U.S. to date are bogus and should remain unconfirmed’.

‘Additionally, CHD notes that most laboratories in the U.S. typically use 35-cycle doubling to detect COVID-19 coronavirus which yields a 97% false positive rate!  This results in a “casedemic” rather than a “pandemic.”  And per World Health Organization guidance, a second test should be performed if the first is positive’.

‘CHD: “It is well established that children have a statistically zero chance of dying from COVID-19 and any preventive measures must result in fewer harms to recipients than the infection.”’

‘CHD emphasizes that asymptomatic students do not spread the virus.  This runs counter to the widely distributed idea that school-age youngsters can spread the virus to their grandparents, who are at high risk’.

‘Regarding prevention, COVID-19 investigational vaccines do not prevent person-to-person transmission anyway’.

‘Some 764 reports of serious adverse events associated with COVID-19 vaccination have been reported so far, and only 1% of actual side effects are typically reported, which suggests far more serious events and vaccine-related deaths may actually be occurring’.

‘Current vaccine trials will not conclude until Oct. 27, 22 and Jan. 31, 2023.  And, most important, the current vaccines in use are not being tested in children!’

‘To read the entire 19-page letter, proceed to the Children’s Health Defense website.  To donate to Children’s Health Defense, listen to Robert F. Kennedy’s appeal on video’.

Patient letter to doctor lays out widespread adverse effects of fake vaccines (which the UK government refuses to publish) and how there is no list of health conditions that should stop people having the fake vaccine. The list will be ‘available in March’ after multiple millions have already had the DNA-manipulating jab. They have contempt for you (link).

‘She reeled off these horrific reactions people were telling her and her colleagues … ‘SEIZURES. ..PARALYSIS IN ARMS, LEGS AND FACES. ..EXTREME  VOMITING , BURNING SKIN ALL OVER, ITCHING HEAD TO TOE … AND VERY BAD HEADACHES FOR DAYS’.

Forced vaccines, vaccine passports against human rights: Council of Europe (link).

‘The Council urged governments to ‘ensure that citizens are informed that the vaccination is NOT mandatory and that no one is politically, socially, or otherwise pressured to get themselves vaccinated, if they do not wish to do so themselves’’

‘The Council of Europe has advised that out of respect for human rights, people must not be forced to have a COVID vaccination, and that there should be no repercussions for those who do not have one’.

‘The Council of Europe was founded in the wake of the Second World War in 1949, and now numbers 47 European countries, with the U.S, Canada and the Holy See listed as observer states. Its purpose is to “promote democracy and protect human rights and the rule of law in Europe,” and is separate to the European Union’.

Children of Men come true? Covid-19 may reduce male fertility worldwide, scientists warn (link).

‘Scientists are sounding the alarm about potential damage to male fertility caused by the coronavirus which threatens to wreak havoc on humanity long after the pandemic has abated’.

‘Researchers from the Huazhong University of Science and Technology in Wuhan are calling for more urgent research into the long-term consequences of Covid-19 infection on male fertility, amid mounting evidence of decreased sperm mobility, lower sperm counts and testicular damage’.

Jogger’s lung collapses after he ran for 2.5 miles while wearing a face mask (link).

‘A collapsed lung, known as a pneumothorax, occurs when air leaks outside the lung’.

‘The patient underwent surgery and was listed in stable condition, the hospital said. Officials believe the life-threatening condition was caused by his wearing of a mask while running’.

Study: Long-Term Mask Use May Contribute to Advanced Stage Lung Cancer (link).

New evidence ties COVID-19 creation to research funded by Fauci (link).

‘Coronavirus adviser argued dangerous endeavor a ‘risk worth taking’’

‘China, the World Health Organization and the U.S. National Institutes of Health have dimissed the theory that the virus causing the global pandemic that has killed more than 2 million people and devastated economies worldwide escaped from the Wuhan, China, lab funded by the United States’.

‘But there’s no disputing the fact, as Newsweek reported in April 2020, that NIH executive Dr. Anthony Fauci promoted a highly controversial type of research involving the manipulation of viruses to explore their potential for infecting humans. And it’s known that more than 200 scientists pressured the Obama administration in 2014 to temporarily halt U.S. funding for that research because of the risk of a manipulated virus accidentally escaping a lab and igniting a pandemic. Nevertheless, under Fauci’s direction, the dangerous virus engineering resumed in 2017 and continued until April 2020’.

‘Now, documentary evidence makes it a “near certainty” that the coronavirus pandemic originated in the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China, where so-called “gain-of-function” research was funded by Fauci’s National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, according to Steve Hilton, who is leading a special investigation for his Fox News show “The Next Revolution.”’

‘Significantly, his investigation found a direct link between a bat coronavirus discovered a decade ago in a mine in Yunnan province and one that had been engineered in the Wuhan lab, 1,000 miles away’.

‘Hilton noted on his show Sunday night that scientists at the Wuhan lab published a paper in February 2020 stating they had recently discovered a virus in Yunnan province that “showed high sequence identity” to COVID-19’.

‘However, Hilton discovered after running the virus’s genome sequence through the NIH’s GenBank database that only one virus was an exact match to COVID-19. It wasn’t the virus discovered recently. It was the once discovered a decade ago in Yunnan province that killed miners who had stirred up bat feces’.

‘Hilton found it curious that the Wuhan researchers not only didn’t reveal that fact, they changed the name of the Yunnan virus, as indicated by GenBank’.

‘As evidence that the Yunnan virus was manipulated in the Wuhan lab, Hilton pointed out that the two viruses are the same, except for two key elements: The COVID-19 virus is more infectious and can enter human cells in the respiratory system’.

‘”Those are the exact places in the viral sequence where gain-of-function techniques would be applied, if … you were funded by the NAID to research bat coronaviruses to explore emergences or spillover potential,” he said’.

‘”Spillover potential” refers to the ability of a virus to jump from animals to humans’.

‘That exact gain-of-function research, he pointed out, was touted in a Nov. 30, 2017, progress report tied to an NAID grant’.

‘The crucial question, Hilton said, was whether the virus at the center of that U.S.-funded work was the one that was discovered in the mine a decade ago’.

‘”The match between that virus and the work commissioned by NAID is so perfect, it’s impossible to believe they weren’t,” he said’.

‘He noted that workers in the Wuhan lab were the first identified cases of COVID-19 in the fall of 2019’.

Implausible coincidences’

The WHO and others are leaning toward a “natural” explanation for the pandemic, Hilton noted. But if the COVID-19 pandemic originated naturally in the Yunnan mine – as the genome sequence indicates – but had nothing to do with research at the Wuhan lab, you would “have to believe in a laughably implausible set of coincidences.” The bats in Yunnan province would have had to infect each other and another unknown animal or a human and then travel 1,000 miles – without infecting anyone else – until they got to Wuhan’.

‘Before any mutations, he argued, the virus was 10 to 20 times more infectious than any previously observed virus occuring in nature’.

‘”And most incredibly of all,” he added, “the infected animal or human would have somehow chosen to make that 1,000-mile trek to the only place in all of China that had been working for years on the virus it was already infected with,” the Wuhan lab’.

‘Significantly, the Chinese regime has blocked access to the Wuhan lab. Last week, NBC News reported that a Wuhan Institute of Virology database with 20,000 entries was removed last spring for “security reasons.”’

Mother getting death threats for suing state over lockdown impact on her young son’s suicide. A swathe of humanity is becoming very, very psychologically sick – exactly as planned by the Global Cult (link, link).

“COVID-19 Jails” Open in Germany for Quarantine Offenders (link).

Asymptomatic spread is not happening and the PCR ‘test’ has a 97% false positive rate.

Visa Signals Further Crypto Ambitions With API Pilot for Bank Customers to Buy Bitcoin (link).

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: